You are in > Archives » Britain » November 2006
November 2006
The NHS: privatisation by stealth
Amicus is
In January 2006, Amicus organised a lobby of Parliament with three slogans: Stop Privatisation; Stop the Cuts; Stop Fragmentation. It was a huge success but even better was the NHS Together Parliamentary Lobby held November 2006, which for the first time united all health unions including the non-TUC affiliates the RCN, RCM and BMA.
Gail Cartmail
How our NHS is being privatised
The government has a vision for the NHS. It wants to transform it from a comprehensive, equitable provider of healthcare into a tax-funded insurer, paying for care provided and even commissioned by others. What emerges will still be called the NHS, but it will not be the NHS as we have known it. It will be a mere logo or kite-mark attached to approved services. This amounts to the privatisation of the health service. Here are just a few examples of the evidence for this.
Handing over the management of primary care trusts. The cat was let out of the bag in late June when the Department of Health placed an advert in the Official Journal of the European Union inviting companies to tender for all the management functions of PCTs. This would have handed control of NHS commissioning to the private sector, meaning
Facing front-page “NHS privatisation by stealth” headlines in the Guardian and the Times, and outright opposition from the unions, the government suddenly pulled the advert, blaming “drafting errors” for giving a “false impression”. Two weeks later the advert was back, this time couched in vague and inoffensive language, but every bit as dangerous.
Privatising GPs. The case of United Health Europe (the British arm of
Subsidising the private sector. The government wants the private sector to set up in “competition” to the NHS in order to create a market. To do this, it has subsidised Independent Sector Treatment Centres (ISTCs) – clinics carrying out simple operations like cataracts, run by private companies for profit but paid for out of the NHS budget. The Department of Health admits that on average these centres have been paid 11% more than the NHS for each procedure, despite only taking on simple and cheap cases and not having to train junior staff. With these factors added in, ISTCs are being paid around 30% more.[4] Companies are also given guaranteed contracts for a set number of operations – whether they perform them or not. The Health Service Journal (21 September 2006) published a damning report showing the shortfalls in procedures undertaken compared with what has been paid for, in one case the PCT reported only 66 per cent of the contracted value was carried out. Quite literally money for old rope.
The role of the private sector is set to be greatly expanded. Tony Blair has said that by 2008, 40% of the work carried out by private hospitals will be paid for by the NHS.[5] Of course companies know very well what is going on – hence the arrival of huge foreign healthcare corporations like United Health, the merger of South African giant Netcare with BMI (Britain’s biggest private hospital group) and a surge in the share prices of companies like Care UK.[6]
More subsidising of the private sector. Recent Department of Health guidance on commissioning seeks to “reduce the risk for providers and consequently make the provision of new services more attractive to... new entrants”. It advises that this be done by paying a “supplement… to cover the set-up or development costs faced by a new provider”; by guaranteeing the “minimum income to be provided”; and by “lowering the barriers for new providers” through “reducing the capital investment required from the provider” – i.e., supplying the buildings.[7]
Charges. With privatisation comes charges for services that were formerly free. This is already happening, as NHS trusts scramble around for money in order to survive in the new market environment. Hospitals are hiking up parking charges and privately installed telephone systems levy 49p a minute for incoming calls to sick relatives.[8] More serious are clinical top-up fees. Queen Charlotte’s and
In their own words. From inside the Department of Health, Andrew Foster, the outgoing workforce director, described the situation well when he said: “The NHS Plan is no longer the blueprint for the NHS. What has really emerged over the last two to three years is that the vision, and it's a prime ministerial vision of all public services, is one where you create a self-improving system by using a mechanism of markets.”[10]
Tony Blair’s vision was revealed when he said that the Tories had been heading in the right direction with their internal market reforms of the 1980s and 1990s. In his opinion they only failed because the reforms were carried out “at a time of chronic underinvestment”. In opposition Blair had taken a different tone, asking John Major in 1995: “Is not the effect of government policy on the health service now to pit nurse against nurse, hospital against hospital, and doctor against doctor? The result will be to divide and rule; and the commercialisation, demoralisation and break-up of the health service, when people want to see the National Health Service run as a proper national service for the people.”[11]
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2250363_2,00.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,1809525,00.html#article_continue http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/5183320.stm
[7] Department of Health, Health reform in
[11] Private Eye 1157, 28 April 2006, p.5